Tuesday, April 28, 2020

A Gift for Usman

Once Usman was on his way to pilgrimage to Mecca and attired in the restricted costume (Ehram) of Haj (pilgrimage to Mecca). Meanwhile, a man happened to bring a roasted bird to him as a gift and for his friends.
Usman did not seem to feel any restriction connected therewith, but his companions did not touch the meat. Thereupon, Usman exclaimed:
“Brothers! This meat of the bird is not prohibited for us, because we did of the pilgrimage. Therefore, I don’t see any harm in eating this meat”.
But the people present in his tent said, “You may not, but Hazrat Ali (a.s.) does not like it despite all the explanation you have given in this connection.”
Then Usman called Hazrat Ali (a.s.) through some one.
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) who was marking the camels there seemed a bit annoyed but still he accompanied the man to the tent of Usman. Usman said to him: 
“O Ali (a.s.)! You always seem to go against me in all the religious matters.”
On this Hazrat Ali (a.s.) said to the people present there,
“I ask you to tell on oath whether the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had not once refused the meat of a roasted wild donkey with the excuse that he and his companions were dressed in the restricted clothes of Haj and if the meat was not given to those who were not?”
About twelve persons present there said on oath that it had actually happened what had been described by Hazrat Ali (a.s.).
Then Hazrat Ali (a.s.) asked the people present there again to say on oath as to whether five eggs of the Ostrich were not once brought to the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) as a gift when he was on his way to Mecca for Haj and also whether had he not refused to eat them on the same place.
About a dozen of people again said on oath that it had happened the same way as was described by Hazrat Ali (a.s.). 
Thereupon, Usman went inside his tent, leaving the gift with those who had brought it.[1]

[1] Musnad Ahmad bin Hambal, vol. 1, pp. 100-104; Manaaqib vol. 2,
p. 194; Naasekhut Tawaarikh, vol. 3, p. 738; Kitabul Um lil Shafai, vol. 7,
p. 257; Sunan-e-Baihaqi, vol. 5, p. 194; Kanzul Ummaal, vol. 3, p. 53, Abu
Turab, vol. 2, pp. 280-281

Monday, April 27, 2020

Treat us Equally

The complainer had brought his complaint to the powerful judge of the time, Umar bin Khattab. 
The involved parties were to be present and the complaint to be presented. 
The complaint was against Amir al-Mu'mineen (pbuh). Umar called unto both people, and seated himself at the chair of judge.
As per Islamic rules, both involved parties must sit by each other, so that equality may be maintained.The khalifa called the complainer, to stand before the judge.
Then he called Imam Ali (pbuh) to stand by this person:
"O Ab-al Hasan, stand by him."
As Imam Ali (pbuh) heard this comment, signs of distress appeared on his face.
The Khalifa asked:
"O Ali, aren't you willing to stand by him?"
Imam (pbuh):
"No, my distress is not for standing by him. My distress comes from the fact that you didn't comply with demands of justice, and equality. You called me with respect, calling me Ab-al Hasan. But you called on this person with his regular name. That is the cause of my distress."

The voice of human justice, p 49.
The explanation of Nahj-al Balagha
of Ibn Abi Hadeed, print of Beirut, v 4, p 18

Saturday, April 25, 2020

Decision that Penitence Purifies a Sinner

It has been described by Saduq (r.a.) on the authority of Saad Bin Tarif who has carried it from Asbagh
A man came to Hazrat Ali (a.s.) and submitted to him that he had committed a major crime and asked him to purify him. Hazrat Ali (a.s.) asked him whether he was suffering from any major disease. 
When he replied in the affirmative, Hazrat Ali (a.s.) asked him to go away, get the disease treated and then come back to him. 
When he came back Hazrat Ali (a.s.) asked him whether he repented over what he had done. 
The man said, “Yes” and wept bitterly. 
Then Hazrat Ali (a.s.) told him that repentance had purified him as sincere repentance and penitence was sufficient for purification. 

But it has been unanimously accepted that nobody else than an Imam can grant forgiveness like this.

Abu Turab, vol. 2, p. 118

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Even the Dogs of Madina Do That


A group of people came to Imam Ali Zaynul Abedeen (pbuh) saying that they were his Shias (followers).

What do you do when you get something?” he asked them.
“We say Alhamdulillah” they replied.

What do you do when something is taken away from you?” Imam asked
“We lament a little and come to terms with it” they replied

What do you do when you do not receive anything” Imam asked further.
“Nothing” they replied.

Even the dogs of Madina do that”. Imam said. 
“When they are given something (food), they wag their tails in shukr.

When something is taken away from them, they bark a little and walk away. 
When they do not get anything, they walk around the streets.”

Our Shias are those who say Alhamdulillah 

  • when they receive something, 
  • when something is taken away and 
  • when they receive nothing.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

A Slave Who Claimed to be the Master of his Master

During the ‘Khilafat’ (Caliphate) of Hazrat Ali (a.s.) two men, a slave and his master, were travelling to Kufa after performing Hajj (Pilgrimage). The slave committed some mistake and the master beat him for that. The slave said to his master: 
“You are my slave, but still you are beating me for nothing.” 
Some other people wanted to decide between the two, but the slave did not admit his mistake and went on repeating that he was the master of the man accompanying him till they all entered Kufa. 
The master then said to his slave: 
“Let us go to Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) for judgement”. 
To that the slave agreed and they both went to Hazrat Ali (a.s.), but while giving their statements before him both claimed to be the master of each other.
The one who was actually the master started weeping that he was the real master and that his father had sent him on pilgrimage to Mecca. He had taken his slave with him who committed a mistake on his way back home and he therefore beat him. By saying that he was the master he wanted to take away wrongfully all his possessions. 
But, the slave also repeated the same story on oath. 
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) after hearing both ordered them to present themselves before him the next day. 
Meanwhile, he ordered two holes to be made in a wall, each one quite enough for the head of a man to pass through. 
When the two men came to him the following day he ordered each of them to put his head into the two holes.
This done, he ordered his personal servant “Cut off the head of the slave”. No sooner the slave heard this order he pulled out his head from the hole while the one who was the master did not move even slightly.
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) then reprimanded the slave, who went away with his master hanging his head in shame.

Monday, April 20, 2020

A Woman Who Did Not Accept a Young Man to be Her Own Son

Kulaini and Sheikh Mohiyyuddin ibne Arabi have described on the authority of Aasim Bin Hamza Alsalooli, who said that he saw a young man crying in a street of Medina, 
“O’ God decide the case between me and my mother”. 
Umar, who was passing by admonished the youth:
‘Don’t call your mother’s name’. 
The man said, “O’ Ameer ul-Momineen! My mother gave me birth and then nursed me for two years, but now when I have grown up, she refuses to own me as her son. She also denies to have ever been married to my father, who is dead, but wants to keep his whole property with the claim that my father was her only brother and thus deprives me of my due share therein”. 
Hearing this Umar called the woman, who produced about forty persons from her tribe as witnesses. They all gave evidence in her favour. Thereupon Umar decided the case against the youth and ordered him to be imprisoned for ‘iftara’ (wrong accusation). 
When the youth was being carried away to the prison; Hazrat Ali (a.s.) happened to pass by that way. The young boy implored him to come to his rescue and related his story to him also.
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) asked his escort to take him back to Umar which they did. 
Umar asked them as to why they had brought him back. 
They told him that it was done at the order of Hazrat Ali (a.s.). 
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) who had also by the time, reached the scene asked Umar, whether he consented if he decided the case. 
To this Umar replied. “By all means, what would be better than this? I have heard the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) saying that your knowledge is the best than that of all of us. 
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) then called the woman and all the witnesses again. They all repeated turn by turn, what they had said before Umar. Hazrat Ali (a.s.) then asked the woman and her near relatives if they agreed to his marrying her to somebody to which they all agreed. 
Thereupon, Hazrat Ali (a.s.) asked his personal servant Qambar to bring 400 dirhams and said
to the woman, “I marry you to this young man for 400 dirhams as your dower.” When the dirhams were brought, he handed them over to the young man and ordered him to go away with the woman and give the dirhams to her. When the young man was about to leave Hazrat Ali (a.s.) added: “Come to me again but not before you both have passed the night as husband and wife”. Hearing this, the woman cried out: ‘Fie, Fie.’ Then she said, “O brother of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) you have married me to my own son”. 
Hazrat Ali (a.s.) said: “Why did you deny the fact before?”
The woman apologized took the hand of the young man in her hand and went away. When she was gone, Umar exclaimed, “Had not there been Ali, Umar would have perished”.
The above event has also been described by Saheb Fazl ibne Shazan who has carried it from Waqadi from Jaabir and from Salman turn by turn with some difference.